(Congalton & Green, 2009) It is important to consider the positional accuracy of mapping products generated from drone collected imagery because many practitioners of drone mapping are blindly claiming to have accuracies greater than they actually do because of statements in drone promotional literature.Ħ Previous Studies Paudie Barry and Ross Coakley, 2013 “The degree of compliance with which the coordinates of points determined from a map agree with the coordinates determined by survey or other independent means accepted as accurate”. To make the comparison of the orthoimagery and digital surface models as accurate as possible the two drones will need to be flown over the same study area, be flown at the same time of day, be flown so as to produce as similar of a product as possible, use the same control points and check points, and the imagery must be processed in the same way. I am currently using a Phantom 4 and am considering purchasing an eBee for the company.Ĥ Objective To compare the horizontal and vertical positional accuracy of orthoimagery and digital surface models derived from a DJI Phantom 4 and a Sensefly eBee. I am starting a drone mapping program at the engineering firm that I work at. I’ve believed that drone technology could benefit society in many ways ever since. Jan Van SickleĢ Outline My objective Previous studies Study area location DronesĬontrol points/ Mission planning/ Processing Accuracy assessmentģ What is My Interest? I got my start with drones in the Air Force where I was a sensor operator for Predator UAVs.
#PIX4DMAPPER VS DJI PRO SERIES#
Redundant batteries and multiple payload configurations increase versatility, making drones from the Matrice 200 series a good fit for a wide variety of applications such as firefighting, search and rescue, utility and infrastructure inspections, mapping and surveying, and more.Presentation on theme: "Positional Accuracy Comparison of a DJI Phantom 4 and a Sensefly eBee"- Presentation transcript:ġ Positional Accuracy Comparison of a DJI Phantom 4 and a Sensefly eBeeĭaniel Hulsey Advisor: Dr. In contrast to the single downward gimbal configuration of the Matrice 200, the Matrice 210 and 210 RTK offer a single downward gimbal, dual downward gimbals, and/or a single upward gimbal for increased versatility. The main point of difference between the Matrice 200 and 210 models is the gimbal configuration. Options available within the 200 series include the Matrice 200, Matrice 210, Matrice 210 V2 and Matrice 210 RTK V2. All of the M200 series drones are sturdy and weather-ready, with an IP43 rating. The Matrice 200 Series includes several model variations utilizing a similar frame. With a large variety of compatible advanced payloads, the M300 RTK is the drone of choice for almost any mission. In addition, the customizable payload configuration setup makes the Matrice 300 RTK a flexible tool to achieve mission objectives with ease and efficiency across a variety of industries and situations. Its UAV Health Management System ensures that the highest level of performance is maintained over time. This drone’s IP45 rating makes it rugged and durable to withstand even the most demanding environments. Offering up to 55 minutes of flight time, the M300 RTK pushes the envelope of what is possible to achieve with a commercial drone. This UAS takes its cues from modern aviation systems, especially in its advanced AI features and 6 Directional Sensing & Positioning for unparalleled functionality and usability. It sets the standard for performance and capability in different industries and use cases with its intelligent flight control system, high-performance flight capabilities, and unmatched reliability. The Matrice 300 RTK drone is the new industry leader in commercial drones. The Matrice series includes the 200 series, and the Matrice 300 RTK- DJI’s latest and greatest Enterprise drone solution with improvements in every aspect over the previous Matrice drones.
0 kommentar(er)
